Pedanticism

From Uncyclopedia test II
Jump to navigation Jump to search

“I was bored (roughly five minutes ago, though you'd have to check when this comment was posted, and compare it to how long on average it takes me to write something before hitting the save button, to work out when exactly I said this, thus providing them with the key to determine when the 'five minutes ago' occured, since anyone reading this will hasten to realise that by the time that they've read this that it will almost certainly be longer than five minutes ago to when I notioned that I had been bored, it's a bit of a longwinded quest, considering I had to check for grammar a couple of times, but y'know, I think it's worth it, just so you can be exactly sure, pedanticly so, as to exactly when I proclaimed myself as bored.) - anyway, I was bored, and decided to creat a quote based article on pedantacism. This, in case you haven't noticed, is it.”

- A Pedant on (on editing this article)

“Recent Surveys suggest tell us, explicitly, that pedantacism is considered by exactly 67.5554545870001598999939982226577777777001010101010110002222834771% of the general population to be annoying.”

- News Reader

“.....not.....good....enough....”

“This is the fourth quote to be added to this article. All of them so far (not including any other quotes that could be added after this one) utilise the "Qnl" (Quote not linked) template, as opposed to the popular "Q" (Quote) template. This provides us with no link to an article on the entity quoted, which us pedants often consider a good thing as the colours of the quoted person links often distract us from our analysis of the exact size of our computer screen. If there's too many links, one may only be able to determine the length and breadth of their monitor to but several decimal places. Remember, every micron counts.”