Talk:Is

We should feature this pupppy --Nerd42 16:45, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I would, but i find the tone rather disrespectful, alluring the reader to believe the great word is still alive, shamefully hiding details of it's drug related demise.

Is was is.

Rest In Peace. --Testostereich • (ballsack) 16:52, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Heh ... you should add that as the beginning of a subpage protesting the article --Nerd42 16:53, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

But muuuuuuuum I don't wanna go to Disney land! --Testostereich • (ballsack) 16:54, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad you approve of my article, Nerd! —rms talk 18:21, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I also approve for feature, but I'll bet someone says 'it's too short'. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:24, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Dan hears that a lot... :P Testostereich • (ballsack) 18:27, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I do, at least. —rms talk 18:28, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

It just so happens that I do have rather short fingers. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:33, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

You know what? Since I'm a greedy pig and shit, I say someone just throws it up for feature and see what happens. From the looks of it, we could three maybe four votes of confidence here. Someone may come along and say it's too short, but what the hell? It's worth a shot, eh? —rms talk 18:47, 4 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

It took me three hours to read this article. —rms talk 03:33, 15 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I was having attention span issues, but I eventually got through it. Next week I'm reading War and Peace! --Nerd42 20:37, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)

Holy shit. This is actually funny.--File:Sig.png (Talk) (Contributions) 05:20, 11 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)