User talk:Readmesoon/Top Ten Articles of 2010

Four articles that involved a hefty amount of my own contribution! —rms talk 22:29, 5 Arche 2011 (UTC)

That all? You're losing your touch. <css>

.nou a{ color:#000000; } .nou a:hover{ text-decoration: none; } .new a{ color:#cc2200; } .new a:visited{ color:#a55858; } </css>~ File:Pointy.png 23:26, 5 Arche 2011

Well, considering I had two (one for each year) over the past two years, I'm satisfied. —rms talk 23:28, 5 Arche 2011 (UTC)

You think we should get this in the Illogicopedia namespace? I say yes. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:47, 7 Arche 2011 (UTC)

What? Why? <css>

.nou a{ color:#000000; } .nou a:hover{ text-decoration: none; } .new a{ color:#cc2200; } .new a:visited{ color:#a55858; } </css>~ File:Pointy.png 17:36, 7 Arche 2011

I'm with Dan. —rms talk 02:35, 8 Arche 2011 (UTC)

Yes, yes. But why? <css>

.nou a{ color:#000000; } .nou a:hover{ text-decoration: none; } .new a{ color:#cc2200; } .new a:visited{ color:#a55858; } </css>~ File:Pointy.png 05:26, 8 Arche 2011

Well, it is the Top Ten Articles of the Year. Holds some significance. I think it would look just a bit more "official" and less "owned by RMS" if it was under the Illogicopedia namespace rather than my userspace. —rms talk 05:35, 8 Arche 2011 (UTC)

So you want it to make sense? <css>

.nou a{ color:#000000; } .nou a:hover{ text-decoration: none; } .new a{ color:#cc2200; } .new a:visited{ color:#a55858; } </css>~ File:Pointy.png 08:19, 8 Arche 2011

Something like that. —rms talk 14:31, 8 Arche 2011 (UTC)