Talk:Spelling
We need more content, RMS. --T3 19:52, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Let me blaze through ther for a bit. —rms talk 19:53, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I added an image. --T3 19:58, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I wrote some more content, I plan ondoing even more, but I'm writing correctly. I'm counting on you to go i and screw it up. —rms talk 20:05, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- You didn't spell everything wrong! --T3 20:05, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- Like I said, i'm countig on you to do the dirty work. I hope you don't mind, it would just take too much time for me to think about writing that all wrong. —rms talk 20:08, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. I enjoy coming up with stoopid ways for people to say things. --T3 20:16, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I changed the positioning of and removed some quotes. Hope you like it. —rms talk 20:24, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I added some of the essential quotes and moved some to a better position. --T3 20:33, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I moved grammar up and added more to it. —rms talk 20:39, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I added some of the essential quotes and moved some to a better position. --T3 20:33, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I changed the positioning of and removed some quotes. Hope you like it. —rms talk 20:24, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. I enjoy coming up with stoopid ways for people to say things. --T3 20:16, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- Like I said, i'm countig on you to do the dirty work. I hope you don't mind, it would just take too much time for me to think about writing that all wrong. —rms talk 20:08, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- You didn't spell everything wrong! --T3 20:05, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I wrote some more content, I plan ondoing even more, but I'm writing correctly. I'm counting on you to go i and screw it up. —rms talk 20:05, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I added an image. --T3 19:58, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
I added a section about Phonics and finished the spelling bees. --T3 01:15, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- Good. I'll add to phonics, and then I'll add a section about the history at the beginning. —rms talk 01:19, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I misspelled all of the creation section. --T3 02:14, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I wrote this comment down. —rms talk 02:18, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- Good for you. --T3 02:19, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I trhink we need to ditch one of the conversations in the alphabet section. —rms talk 02:21, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I'm gonna delete the part after the "alphabet soup out your ass" because that part's the least funneh. --T3 02:24, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I trhink we need to ditch one of the conversations in the alphabet section. —rms talk 02:21, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- Good for you. --T3 02:19, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I wrote this comment down. —rms talk 02:18, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- I misspelled all of the creation section. --T3 02:14, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
I added more to the "Fonniks" section. Tell me if it needs more. Wait. It's only 9:00am where you are. Well, when you get up (I just did and it's 12:34) tell me if it needs more. --T3 16:36, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- DUde. I added a on Phonics, but what we need to do is rearrange the section. Before you go in and misspell, let me rearrange it, ok? —rms talk 16:41, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
An insane aamount of applause goes to you for this, but
...fucking hell reading that made me want to blow my brains out, don't ask me how I read all of it. I nearly cried. --
17:43, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)- ...and it's not finished. By the way, I did all of the misspelling. You're welcome. And by the way, why did you read it? I wrote the freaking thing and I wouldn't put myself through that kind of torture. --T3 17:45, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
- ....because I'm a ..... good ....admin. It was toture, but it's over now so it's all good, :D -- 17:46, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
Just thought i'd mention it
You two have recently come along these past weeks/months, I don't know about time, I'm not a watch. But yeah, good work, you're generally good and funny and stuff, so hot piss i guess. --
18:47, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)- Well, thanks alot. All of my most recent articles have been good lengths and quality I think. Also, note how this talkpage has more view than the regular page. —rms talk 18:57, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
VANITY!
I highlighted this article and I did see a message informing of who wrote this? O_O --Galanoth 22:49, 23 Yoon 2009 (UTC)